Many Canadian pharmacies will need to take a hard look at operations in response to new legislation on revenue sources. Some will make the mistake of trying to reduce costs in order to cover the loss of revenue – a strategy that almost always leads to a loss of customer service and a consequent loss of both margin (due to the inevitable eroding of prices) and volume. Instead, pharmacies should be looking to grow their top line by adding new products and services. The only question is “How do I know whether the new product or service will fly?”
While there can be no guarantees, the best framework for evaluating new ideas is called the “Diffusion of Innovation.” It offers five characteristics of any innovation that determine its likelihood of rapid acceptance. The thinking is that once a preliminary evaluation is done, any areas of weakness can be shored up with the appropriate actions; accordingly, the new product idea should be dropped if remedies cannot be found.
Factor 1: Relative Quality Advantage
This refers to how much better the new product is in comparison to whatever (in the broadest sense) the customer is currently using. For example, a new line of bandages would be compared to existing bandages; a new method of quitting smoking would be compared to whatever the customer is now using to quit smoking, and if you are adding a new product category to your store, the comparison would be against wherever the consumer now buys the product.
There are two key things to remember. First, in comparing quality, don’t just think about the advantages of the innovation. The acceptance of most innovations involves a tradeoff, so there are likely to be disadvantages too. For example, shopping on the internet has time and transportation savings but suffers from shipping and handling costs and an inability to “touch the goods.”
Second, in making quality comparisons, be sure to segment the market between early adopters who will easily see the advantages and/or don’t care about the disadvantages and those in the more mainstream market who will need to be “educated.” The greater the number of early adopters, the less you’ll need to spend to introduce the new product and the faster the innovation will gain momentum.
Factor 2: Compatibility with Values
Sometimes a product can deliver great relative quality but it does it in a way that some people will reject. For example, genetically modified food may be enriched, look better and last longer, but some people will reject it on the basis that it is less natural. Similarly, some people may see the benefits of looking younger as desired but may reject methods that require the injection or ingestion of artificial substances.
This is one of the toughest issues, since such objections are usually philosophical in nature and are as much a matter of opinion as of fact. All you can do is try to determine the prevailing philosophy for your target customer. Example: beer advertising is often seen as male-oriented but it continues because women tend to be low consumers of beer (and yes, I realize this is a “chicken and egg” issue).
Factor 3: Complexity of Adoption
This refers to how easy it is for the consumer to purchase, adopt and use the innovation. For example, DNA testing for proclivity toward certain diseases may be available and a seemingly great idea. However, the acceptance of this innovative service has been hampered in gaining widespread adoption by the high price tag, the need to send samples away to a lab and the time lag between desire (wanting the product) and fulfillment (getting the report). For drug and OTC products, you might consider factors like size of pill, rigidity of schedule or complexity of application.
Factor 4: Inherent Risk
There are two levels of risk. First is the risk that the product will not work as promoted and the consumer will be out the purchase price. This risk is relatively easy to minimize via guarantees, samples and trial periods. The second risk is more complex: the risk of downstream consequences. For example: try this tooth whitener – if gums go raw or teeth fall out, will the consumer be happy with a refund of purchase price?
Factor 5: Communicability
This refers to how easy it is to communicate factors 1 through 4 to your consumer. For tangible products, you can always rely on the power of product demonstration to actually show the product working. For less tangible products, like services, you need to find a way to let the customer gain reassurance or experience the benefit without actually having the product (try communicating great taste without the customer actually tasting it). Sampling can help, but you can also use recommendations from satisfied users, certification from accredited sources and in-store demos to make your point.
A Final Note
There is a tendency to think that great scores on four of the five factors can compensate for a weak score on the other. This is incorrect. Experience suggests that you are only as good as your weakest link, so leave nothing to chance. Do the evaluation and be brave enough to explore new ideas to overcome deficiencies.
New products fail more often than they succeed and there is almost never a perfect innovation right out of the box. Don’t be afraid to try new things, even if they require a little work to make them right. My favourite saying in this regard: “A ship in harbor is safe – but that is not what ships are built for.”
Posted by tevaonlineforbusiness 



